On Friday, 13 December, the VUB research group BRIO will present the third Language Barometer survey (TBR3) for the Flemish Periphery. The report provides a sharp analysis of the evolving linguistic landscape in this unique region. The findings reveal a significant rise in linguistic diversity, with no fewer than 104 different languages spoken, while also shedding light on the policy challenges and opportunities this development presents.

The Flemish Periphery, an officially Dutch-speaking area with language facilities in six municipalities, is heavily influenced by migration from Brussels and increasing internationalisation. Despite these trends, Dutch remains firmly embedded in the daily lives of local residents. However, the study also highlights slight declines in the knowledge of both Dutch and French, alongside the growing dominance of English as a secondary language.
Mathis Saeys
VUB's BRIO research group.
Key Findings
  • Linguistic Diversity: The number of spoken languages in the Flemish Periphery has risen from 75 in 2013 to 104 in 2024. English continues to gain ground as a communication language, alongside Dutch and French.
     
  • Home Language: The proportion of residents who speak only Dutch at home has further declined to 37.7%, while the share of French speakers and multilingual households has increased.
     
  • Language Use: Dutch remains the most widely used language in formal contexts, such as municipal administration and the workplace. However, multilingualism is on the rise in professional environments.
     
  • Policy Implications: The growing linguistic diversity calls for a differentiated language and integration policy that addresses the specific challenges faced by the different clusters of municipalities.

The report underlines that the Flemish Periphery cannot be treated as a monolithic region. Municipalities like Asse and Grimbergen remain predominantly Dutch-speaking, while municipalities with language facilities, such as Kraainem and Linkebeek, exhibit a stronger French-speaking character.

The study calls on policymakers to continue promoting Dutch while embracing an inclusive approach that recognises linguistic diversity. Dutch serves as a crucial bridge language, facilitating both formal and informal interactions.

With TBR3, BRIO provides a valuable tool for academics, policymakers, and practitioners to further the societal debate on language and integration in the Flemish Periphery. The full report is available on the website. 

*This is a machine translation. We apologise for any inaccuracies.

Contact:
 

Mathis Saeys: mathis.saeys@vub.be | +32 487 70 97 39